Originally by: Astria Tiphareth

---

Originally by: Jesse Jamess

---

so now n00bs have an equal opprotunity to kill people who have been skilling and playing for multiple years...

---

Ah, I see what you did there. Tell you what, lets rename ISK and skills to levels, and then you can go and complain that you're level 50 and this bunch of level 2s killed you.

---

Originally by: Ed Kraka

---

THIS IS BULL**** NANO FLEETS ARE NOT INVULNERABLE YOU JUST NEED THE SKILL AND KNOW HOW TO STOP THEM..


THIS IS A BUFF FOR ALL THE WHINGING CAREBEARS THAT JOINED FACTION WARFARE AND CRIED COS THEY COULDNT HIT SH*T.

ITS DISGUSTING THAT CCP IS EVEN THINKING OF NERFING EVERYTHING THAT GOES FAST. DISGUSTING!

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Edited by: Matrix Skye on 26/07/2008 21:56:57
Edited by: Matrix Skye on 26/07/2008 21:55:40

Originally by: Smokie McLottapot

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

The nano ho's defense:

"If you can't catch and kill nanos it's because you're an idiot and you suck! Now don't take my precious nano away because I don't want to die! But YOU are the cowards anyway!"

---

Maybe it's "Your taking away the only viable anti-blob tactic in game" thing that some don't like?
And once again, post with your main Mr. Nutless

---

i'll tell you what, let's exchange address and phone numbers and let neither of us hide behind this internet bullshit. k? oh? that's not what you meant? dont have the balls? give me your info and i promise to send you mine. that way we're at it men to men with a pair of balls each.

lets see who's the chicken shit now. no hiding behind spaceship avatars. like two real men.

---

Originally by: Motaka

---

Originally by: sophisticatedlimabean

---

The for and against nano nerf threads seem to be telling the story of how ppl feel.

AGAINST THE NERF 15 PAGES SO FAR:

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832371

FOR THE NERF TO GO AHEAD 5 PAGES:

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=832369

---

I lol'd at this,they had one with the gankageddon nerf as well and we all know how that turned out dont we.

But if you go to church today and pray really hard to baby jesus im sure...... NANO'S WILL STILL GET NERFED.

cry some more then cry harder.your one trick pony is going,and i for for one is a very very happy camper.

---

Originally by: Nahia Senne

---

Change is good.

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye
if i go searching through all 90+ pages will you admit you were wrong when i find the PL ******ed whines? or will this become a "well, he didn't really mean that he was just angry..."?

and how exactly an alt's point invalidated? there are way way too many ******ed children playing eve and i dont wish to bring unwanted childish grief and waste of time to my online friends. if you cant understand this too bad.[/quote

---

IF you searched 90 pages of posts here i would then say you have 0 life.....


and i dont believe that you have friends...

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Originally by: Sakura Nihil

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Quote:

---

I'd also like you to stop posting with an alt, but I doubt either are going to happen.

---

and how exactly an alt's point invalidated? there are way way too many ******ed children playing eve and i dont wish to bring unwanted childish grief and waste of time to my online friends. if you cant understand this too bad.

---

Because it shows you have exactly zero credibility, and likely don't know what you're talking about.

---

Ad Hominem Tu Quoque (look it up)

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Edited by: Matrix Skye on 27/07/2008 18:13:03

Originally by: Jesse Jamess

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Originally by: Sakura Nihil

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Quote:

---

I'd also like you to stop posting with an alt, but I doubt either are going to happen.

---

and how exactly an alt's point invalidated? there are way way too many ******ed children playing eve and i dont wish to bring unwanted childish grief and waste of time to my online friends. if you cant understand this too bad.

---

Because it shows you have exactly zero credibility, and likely don't know what you're talking about.

---

Ad Hominem Tu Quoque (look it up)

---

please use english so i can insult you properly....

---

oh boy, the ******s

Copy and paste the term into a google search.
Click perhaps on the first link that you get.
Read and learn something new, ****** .

I'd do all this for you and just link it up, but perhaps I'll teach you how to look stuff up. it'll help you later on in life. No need to thank me.

edit: Nevermind. I just realized I'm dealing with monkeys here and you really won't learn anything. Just pretend like you understood, skip all that, and get straight to the insult .

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Originally by: Andnowthenews

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

"EVERYONE'S AN IDIOT EXCEPT ME AND MY NANO BUDDIES SO SUCK YOU!!!! WAAAH WAAAH WAAH!!!!"

cry some more please. i luv your tears. insult me! tell me how much you hate me and how stupid and idiotic i am. tell me how i've ruined your game and how it makes you want to quit :D

---

You do not even give a crap about nano or not you just gain a sick pleasure from seeing other ppl ****ed off. You are one of life's victims and failures that sees something that is ****ing off other ppl and so you try to find as much joy in there annoyance as possible. You are the most sickeningly pathetic and repulsive individual i have ever had experience with.

PS: i think this nerf is excessive but i do think the speed issue needs a look at.

---

if you act like an adult i'll treat you like an adult. check out the posts especially from the first few pages. most of what you read are insults and hatred messages to caldari players, etc. unfortunately the only way some of these idiots here understand is by degrading oneself to their level and speaking their hatred vitriol.

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

im not an adult yet :) im 14 years old and im glad ccp is listenenening to me because im ruining YOUR game. PWND! HAHAHAHA! my imaginary girlfriend laffs at you N00b!

---

Originally by: Matrix Skye

---

Originally by: Andnowthenews

---

Just say they were all Armour tanked or shield tanked are you saying that the result would have been different?.

er nope.

---

I'm sure the result would have not been different. But that isn't what i'm arguing now is it .
You do a great job at switching topics when it comes to bite you. Keep it up.

---

Originally by: Arlenna Molatov

---

Edited by: Arlenna Molatov on 28/07/2008 06:40:17

Originally by: Marcus Druallis

---

Originally by: CCP Nozh

---

Originally by: Lt Angus

---

Sounds good overall, but feel it might nerf blaster ships more then speed ships

---

On the other hand, if you fit a warp scrambler and stasis webifier, the overall speed reduction is much greater than 90%. That is, if your target is using a MWD not an afterburner.

But this is something we'll be keeping a close eye on.

---

The only thing you need to keep a close eye on is the number of subscribers to eve. lol its probably gonna drop to half its current size.

This nerf will completely destroy pvp in eve. The only pvp will be laggy blobs. Can't wait. Gonna be great... I cannot believe you managed to ruin the game due to uneducated whines from people with probably very little pvp experience. Thanks again.

---

Destroy PVP?? you have GOT to be F**KING kidding me right?? You mean JUST like when Missles were nerfed, PVP was comming to and END!! Just like when armour and hitpoints were increased! PVP was DEAD!! You mean when ECM mods were completely changed..PVP WAS DOOMED!!

I can continue the list for a whole page!!!

Lets face it...the VAST majority of the whining is comming from those VERY people who have fricking *****ed and whined about PVP nerfs in the past and currently use NANO ship right now. And quite contrary to what some of you say, MOST alliance AND virtually ALL PVP allaince NOW use NANO ships because they KNOW they can kill much more efficiently and run away a lot easier without nearly as much risk for the reward.

Besides, all you fricking whiners always want to look over the EXPLICIT reason its getting nerfed. CCP have stated that the engine was NOT INTENDED FOR THOSE TYPES OF SPEEDS. When the F**K are you going to get that through your heads?>???????????????????????

So you can sit here and ***** about it all you want. When the GAME DEVS say it wasn't designed to work that way then all your whining and childish tantrums ISNT going to change the fact they are going to change THEIR game to the point THEY feel its more balanced.

Either LIVE with it or CANCEL your accounts and stop with the threats already. Put your mouse where your mouth is and hit cancel already. It will free up server resources for the rest of us!

---

Originally by: clyno

---

Originally by: Jesse Jamess

---

Edited by: Jesse Jamess on 28/07/2008 06:23:25
to those who think otherwise... in reality us nanno pilots will still be faster than you we will still catch you... and we will still continue to pimp our rides, and pwn you..

---

This. If you have good skills and are willing to pay loads of ISK then your pimpmobile will be faster that carebear ships, you will still catch them and you will still be able to get out of messy situations.
But the difference will be reduction in your top speed, so you will be more vulnerable than you are now, so you'll have to use some common sense in deciding which targets you want to attack.

And hopefully ***as wont be able to catch rigged ceptors anymore.

---

Originally by: Princess Jodi

---

Originally by: NemisisEnforcer

---

You know I didn't even realize it at first but CCP Nozh is the same fool that came up with the proposed and failed carrier nerf as well. CCP you should not let this guy come up with ideas anymore as he always gets you in trouble with your players. WE MAKE EVE WHAT IT IS. Without us you are nothing and your little "don't make I quit" threats remark Mr Nozh was cute. Eat shit. You drastically change game play and people will quit as they have invested time, skill training, isk, real money, and a lot of thought into their setups and for you to just take that away is bullshit.

---

Nope, it wasn't Nozh. He-Who-Should-Not-Be-Named was ZuluPark. I still have the Raggedy Andy costume for him, and Michael Jackson still has the Rhopinal-laced Jesus Juice waiting for him. Grandma might not have paid her internet bill so the live feed might not be ready, however.



I fully support this change. Ships should not be allowed to fly so fast that no weapon can hit them.

---

Originally by: Sanis Jalthar

---

insert wall of useless dribble...

---

Originally by: Sanis Jalthar

---

insert wall of useless dribble...

---

Originally by: Andnowthenews

---

Originally by: Hoshino Rika

---

Originally by: sophisticatedlimabean

---

The vaga should max out at around 7kms the others at around 5kms at least or you may as well scrap the entire line of HAC's. And playing with the name to justify reducing them to utter worthlessness is just pathetic btw.

---

and ypou cant fit other than nano? like use the T2 resistances the HACs have and fit ythem for tank? or use damage bonuses and fit for gank? well fitet HAC is realy powerfull ship, not only with nano >_>

---

I doubt theirs a hac in the game that can tank as well as most battle cruisers, the only thing that most hacs are good for is nano, if you remove that you may as well remove hacs.

---

Originally by: Andnowthenews

---

Originally by: Hoshino Rika

---

Originally by: sophisticatedlimabean

---

The vaga should max out at around 7kms the others at around 5kms at least or you may as well scrap the entire line of HAC's. And playing with the name to justify reducing them to utter worthlessness is just pathetic btw.

---

and ypou cant fit other than nano? like use the T2 resistances the HACs have and fit ythem for tank? or use damage bonuses and fit for gank? well fitet HAC is realy powerfull ship, not only with nano >_>

---

I doubt theirs a hac in the game that can tank as well as most battle cruisers, the only thing that most hacs are good for is nano, if you remove that you may as well remove hacs.

---